SAT: Cross-Text Connections Cheat Sheet
The core ideas of SAT: Cross-Text Connections distilled into a single, scannable reference — perfect for review or quick lookup.
Quick Reference
Identifying Points of Agreement
Determining where two authors share a common position, conclusion, or assumption. Agreement may be explicit (both state the same claim) or implicit (both assume the same premise without stating it).
Identifying Points of Disagreement
Determining where two authors reach different conclusions, interpret evidence differently, or hold conflicting assumptions. Disagreement can range from direct contradiction to subtle differences in emphasis.
Synthesizing Multiple Viewpoints
Combining information from two or more sources to form a more complete understanding. Synthesis is not simply summarizing each text but identifying how they work together -- complementing, qualifying, or complicating each other.
Qualifying or Extending a Claim
One text may add nuance, conditions, or limitations to a claim made in another text. This is not outright disagreement but rather a refinement that narrows or broadens the original position.
Counterexample or Counterargument
One text may present a specific case, finding, or argument that challenges the general claim made in another text. A counterexample does not necessarily disprove the claim but weakens its universality.
Shared Evidence, Different Conclusions
Two authors may reference the same data, study, or historical event but draw different conclusions from it. This reveals differences in interpretation, values, or analytical frameworks.
Complementary Perspectives
Two texts may address different aspects of the same issue without contradicting each other. Together, they provide a more complete picture than either text alone.
Tone and Stance Comparison
Beyond content, two texts may differ in their tone (optimistic vs. cautious), level of certainty (definitive vs. tentative), or rhetorical approach (persuasive vs. descriptive). These differences reveal how each author positions themselves relative to the topic.
Implicit vs. Explicit Relationships
Some cross-text relationships are stated outright (explicit), while others must be inferred from the content (implicit). The SAT often tests implicit relationships, requiring students to read between the lines.
Methodological Disagreement
Two authors may disagree not about the conclusion but about how to reach it -- the research methods, evidence standards, or analytical tools they consider valid.
Key Terms at a Glance
Get study tips in your inbox
We'll send you evidence-based study strategies and new cheat sheets as they're published.
We'll notify you about updates. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.